|
|
Post by theanswer on Jan 30, 2008 23:48:32 GMT -5
i swear this topic is burning!
I make this site popular just kidding
maybe wcpw needs a new star? just kidding
|
|
|
|
Post by xyiom on Jan 31, 2008 13:14:06 GMT -5
I do that myself. Set threads on fire!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by theanswer on Jan 31, 2008 19:33:25 GMT -5
But i have done it more
i have great ideas.
|
|
|
|
Post by xyiom on Feb 1, 2008 0:56:29 GMT -5
Your a rookie son especially when it comes to this
|
|
|
|
Post by theanswer on Feb 1, 2008 11:50:55 GMT -5
well we'll put it this way
so far i have been rookie of the month
and i will be an actual rookie soon in the ring!
|
|
|
|
Post by xyiom on Feb 4, 2008 22:11:34 GMT -5
Keep dreaming one day you'll be able to dream of being a rookie here?
|
|
|
|
Post by theanswer on Feb 4, 2008 23:26:57 GMT -5
oo trust me i will be
|
|
|
|
Post by stonecold on Mar 9, 2008 0:47:44 GMT -5
Well, it appears that the Heavyweight title, the League title, and the Bare Knuckles title will be unified at B.O.B 20
|
|
|
|
Post by stonecold on Mar 9, 2008 13:57:10 GMT -5
Since it really has no significance, maybe the Inner City title can be unified with the Middleweight title
|
|
|
|
Post by charlieman3172 on Mar 9, 2008 19:30:21 GMT -5
Iagree but that match will probably only happen if austin is still the champ. we need to unify that inner city championship because it hasn't been defended since god knows when.
|
|
|
|
Post by bthree on Mar 10, 2008 2:18:38 GMT -5
The inner city is not going to be a title recognized by WCPW. If the UAPW start running shows again in the future Mak Banggs will be recognized as the Champ & go from there. In the next few weeks we will have a interview w/Sam DeCero on Web Aggression detailing the title situations.
|
|
|
|
Post by nbk9mil on Mar 16, 2008 2:55:04 GMT -5
Originally, the IC title was meant for every match to be an Inner City Street Fight. With the 1st champ it was like that, but for some reason after he lost it the company got further from the idea. After Belts, you may see a reemergence of UAPW, if it does, either way, the IC title is the secondary belt to the UAPW Heavyweight Title. Much like every other fed has a secondary title. That is how it was originally intended.
|
|
|
|
Post by nbk9mil on Mar 16, 2008 3:01:06 GMT -5
As far as unifying the WCPW titles, sometimes to make things more important to the competition, you have to eliminate some options. to make the Heavyweight title more important, you drop a couple other titles. when the competition is thinned like it is, you have to adjust for that.
|
|
|
|
Post by charlieman3172 on Mar 17, 2008 16:26:22 GMT -5
Wcpw i believe is on the verge of bringing in more stars once again and is about to become huge once more. So right now maybe unify a couple of titles is good but then again maybe not. well have to see
|
|
|
|
Post by stonecold on Mar 17, 2008 20:16:32 GMT -5
Unifying the titles could turn out to be good in order to make things more competative
|
|
